IMPROVED GROWTH
IN A DIVERGING WORLD
The global economy is still struggling to gain momentum as many
high-income countries continue to grapple with legacies of the global financial
crisis and emerging economies are less dynamic than in the past.
Global growth in 2014 was lower than initially expected, continuing a pattern of disappointing figures over the past several years. Growth picked up only marginally in 2014, to 2.6 percent, from 2.5 percent in 2013. Beneath these headline numbers, increasingly divergent trends are at work in major economies.
Global growth in 2014 was lower than initially expected, continuing a pattern of disappointing figures over the past several years. Growth picked up only marginally in 2014, to 2.6 percent, from 2.5 percent in 2013. Beneath these headline numbers, increasingly divergent trends are at work in major economies.
Barring major geopolitical upheaval, global economic growth in 2015
will hold at a rate close to 3 percent, we believe. The U.S will continue to grow but the
expansionary phase will show signs of maturing, causing a moderation in company
profitability, joined by a variety of cost pressures. The Eurozone continues to flounder, with
significant weakness in the large economies of Germany, France and Italy. True, European economies may have more scope
to recover but there are dark clouds—from slowing exports to emerging markets,
especially hurting Germany’s growth engine, and a dysfunctional policy
environment to tackle the serious deflationary pressures, which have emerged. Then there is Greece!
UK – POLITICAL PARTIES FIRE MAY
2015 ELECTION GUN
The U.K’s economic growth
slowed more than expected in the final three months of last year but with
annual growth still at its fastest since 2007, the data gives ammunition to
both sides of the political divide heading into May's General Election. Growth in the third quarter fell to 0.5
percent from 0.7 percent in the third. But
for the year as a whole, the economy grew by 2.6 percent, the Office for
National Statistics (ONS) said, up from 1.7 percent in 2013 and putting it on
track to have been the world's fastest-growing major advanced economy last year,
though some may point to imbalances within the data (See Fig. 1).
While most countries have not
yet reported 2014 growth data, Britain's is ahead of International Monetary
Fund estimates for other big developed nations, a fillip for the Conservatives
and PM David Cameron, who faces the General Election on May 7. Oppositions, on the
other hand, who form governments also need momentum, a dominance over the field
of debate - and luck. Napoleon, it is said, wanted lucky generals. Now Ed Miliband’s troops wonder whether their
commander breaks too many mirrors. For
four and a half years, the Labour leader has set out the case to rewire the
British economy to make average earners better off. Oppositions pray for bad news, and a run of
positive economic data, the Tories say, has holed their case for radical change
below the waterline. Therefore, despite
the polls being largely neck and neck between Labour and Conservative, a number
ask whether Ed Miliband is an unlucky
general? A slew of positive
economic data certainly gives Ed
Miliband an upwards struggle, we feel.
PROSPECTS FOR THE GLOBAL ECONOMY – A
COMPLICATED MOSAIC
One of the most
significant Economic factors of recent times has been the worldwide benefit of the
“plunge” in oil prices, which have more than halved since last June. But this large positive, is also being
increasingly offset by adverse factors. For
instance, the IMF, in its most recent report, (Jan 20), cites weaker prospects
for China, Russia, the Eurozone and Japan as well as a slowdown in some major
oil exporters because of the sharp drop in crude prices. New factors supporting growth – lower oil prices,
but also depreciation of euro and yen – are increasingly being offset by
persistent negative forces, including the lingering legacies of the financial
crisis and lower potential growth in many countries – e.g. Russia is now
viewed as being in outright recession this year, as falling oil prices and
sanctions imposed by western governments take their toll. Japan is also in recession and China slowing
down.
This
certainly makes for a complicated mosaic... good news for oil importers, bad news for oil
exporters. Good news for commodity
importers, bad news for exporters. Continuing
struggles for the countries which show scars of the crisis, and not so for
others. Good news for countries more
linked to the euro and the yen, bad news for those more linked to the dollar.
The UK is expected to lose its
place as the fastest-growing major economy to the US this year, with UK growth
forecast at 2.7% and the US at 3.6%. For the Eurozone, though, we may expect a
drag from weaker investment prospects, particularly thanks to a knock-on effect
on exporters from an emerging markets slowdown. That is predicted to offset
support from lower oil prices, the recent euro depreciation, an easing in
austerity programmes and more monetary policy support, which has just been
unveiled after the European Central Bank’s (ECB) latest meeting. This support
comes in the form of a €60bn-a-month Quantitative Easing (QE) for the Eurozone,
starting in March and continuing for 19 months, which may be regarded as an
imperfect compromise but by protecting itself from losses, the ECB recognises
the possibility of European sovereign default. Essentially, it is a commitment
to flood the Eurozone with more than €1 trillion ($1.16 trillion) in newly
created money. What it does is create a new stimulus to strengthen demand,
increase capacity utilization and support money and credit growth. Such a vast
expansion of the ECB’s easy-money policies would traditionally stoke inflation
down the road but it must be noted that inflation has stayed very low even
after several interest-rate cuts and abundant ECB loans to banks. We have seen
QE in the U.S. and Japan, but we believe its success is also dependent upon
structural reform. Without that it may not work and, frankly, we see little
sign (of structural reform) in key countries like France and Italy.
US: MODERATELY POSITIVE
- US growth will grow at a modest 2.6 percent in 2015.
- Profitability may come under increased pressure as the business cycle matures and cost increases are imminent.
- America’s strength in technological progress needs to help accelerate productivity.
UK: A POSITION OF RELATIVE STRENGTH
·
Despite positive economic figures, significant
longer term challenges stemming from the country’s fiscal situation do remain.
·
Political uncertainty – multi party politics and
unknown Coalition deals?
EURO-AREA: CAUTIOUS; DOWNSIDE RISKS
ACCUMULATE
- Despite significant downside risks, the Euro Area is projected to grow at 1.6 percent in 2015, almost double that of 2014.
- Modest recovery in domestic consumption is a likely source of growth as labour markets improve.
- However, deflation has arrived and could yet bring growth rates down further.
- The Greece burden – see Special Feature below.
ASIA-PACIFIC: CHALLENGING IN CHINA; MOSTLY
POSITIVE ELSEWHERE
- Despite softening growth rates, the Asia-Pacific region remains the leader for global growth.
- Growth rates of China and India are converging to 5.5 percent from 2015–2019.
- Despite short-term headwinds from the global economy, Southeast Asia will strengthen.
LATIN AMERICA: UPSIDE POTENTIAL
- Economic conditions in Latin America are unlikely to improve rapidly in 2015, with regional growth at only 1.8 percent.
- Slowing prices for commodity and energy exports provide significant downside.
- Productivity growth should build on investment, improved business confidence, and a better educated labour force.
A
SPECIAL FEATURE: THE IMPORTANCE OF GREECE AND WHERE
THE EUROZONE GOES FROM HERE?
Syriza's election victory raises some difficult
questions for the other countries using the currency and for the European
institutions.
The party's proposals represent a challenge to the
austerity that has been a central feature of the Eurozone’s response to the financial
crisis - bailout loans combined with spending cuts and tax rises to reduce
borrowing needs and economic reforms to encourage growth.
For the architects of that response - especially
the European Commission and Germany - the idea of renegotiating the terms and
reducing the debt is an unpalatable one.
Germany and some other Eurozone countries already
have political problems with the bailouts - received by a total of five
countries. Many voters resented the
financial assistance, even though it was loans.
Any suggestion that they won't be repaid in full will aggravate those
concerns.
The key to the Greek burden does lie with the
Eurozone and its taxpayers. And, the
inevitable question?
After Greece, Spain?
There is a fudge that could be used to ease the
Greek debt burden, and it has already been used. That is to reduce the interest rate on its
debts to the Eurozone and extend the repayment period without actually cutting
the nominal value of the debt to be repaid and the odds are that some sort of
compromise will emerge. Yet, to give
ground to Syriza could also be read as suggesting that the austerity approach
was a fundamental mistake. After all
many economists argued that cutting government spending and raising taxes was
exactly the wrong thing to do in economies that were already weak. Austerity aggravated the weakness, they
argued, and so undermined tax revenue and exacerbated the government financial
problems it was supposed to fix.
Another problem for Germany and those that share
its view is that concessions to Syriza might embolden anti-austerity political
forces in other countries.
Spain's Podemos party is a striking recent arrival
on the political scene, but others will also be watching developments in Greece
very closely. But even if the eurozone
can keep the lid on any financial market fears of a wider break-up, the
possibility of Greece leaving can't be discounted.
The Syriza leader Alexis Tsipras says he doesn't
want it and nor does Greek public opinion.
Even Germany doesn't want it, though there is a limit to the concessions
that Chancellor Angela Merkel and her Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble are
likely to make.
So the odds are that some sort of compromise will
emerge. It may well be messy and be slow
to take shape. But then did the Eurozone
ever do anything that's difficult quickly or easily?
MARKET
OUTLOOK: STILL GO GLOBAL AND MANAGE RISK BY ASSET ALLOCATION
As demonstrated by the returns over past decades, and as said before, choosing
a strong approach to managing assets can make a big difference to a
portfolio. Avoiding common mistakes,
such as emotional decision making, only focusing on traditional asset classes,
and not having a risk management plan, is important. Often investors don’t have the time or the
patience to manage their assets effectively. Maintain decent UK exposure but consider, as
well, foreign market exposure. Within
equities, consider a value approach.
Within and across asset classes, consider using trend following methods
and diversity to reduce risk and exposure to catastrophic loss.
Geopolitical tensions and any disappointment on corporate
earnings will create dips but we still regard any such dips as an opportunity
for selective buying opportunities. Many analysts believe the oil price
needs to trade around $40 a barrel to slow supply growth and keep capital
investment in shale sidelined. High
quality global journalism requires investment.
But most importantly there is no sign of Opec, or its de facto leader Saudi Arabia, changing policy and lowering its production target of 30m barrels a day. Indeed, Mr Badri said last week that Opec was
“not the cause” of the supply glut “so we are not cutting”.
Sources
·
Office For National Statistics (ONS) January and
February 2015 Economic Reviews
·
The Wall Street
Journal, 22 Jan 2015
·
BBC News Business,
Robert Peston Blog, 20 Jan 2015
·
IMF You Tube Video
Release – 22 Jan update of the World Economic Outlook, Chief Economist
Olivier Blanchard
·
Financial Times – Global Economy comment and
review, Background Research Jan / Feb 2015
The above is our
opinion but it is no guarantee of future performance. The above information should also not be
solely relied upon for investment purposes.
We
seek a balanced portfolio and reiterate the preference for putting in place a balanced portfolio of investments, made up of
collective investments. As you are
aware, there are many ways to invest in equities. Each has its own practical and taxation
considerations and, for this purpose, collective investments, such as unit
trusts, are an appropriate means by which a good spread of investments may be
achieved. Such pooled funds put the fund
in a position to hold a good spread of company shares. The funds are managed on a day-to-day basis
by professional investment managers to try and achieve the best possible
returns. They represent the best means
of managing the risks by asset allocation.
The value of investments and any income will fluctuate (this may partly
be the result of exchange rate fluctuations) and investors may not get back the
full amount invested. Past performance
is not a guide to future returns. Current
tax levels and reliefs may change. Depending
on individual circumstances, this may affect investment returns.
SJK 02.02.15